مزار مختار ثقفی

محمد بن جرير الطبري

أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعا

Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

أحمد بن يحيى البلاذري

أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف

Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

مسلم بن الحجاج

حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف ا

Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

محمد بن عيسى الترمذي

أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختل

Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

إسماعيل بن كثير

أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعا

Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

أبو الفرج الأصفهاني

الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحا

Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

محسن الأمين

ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعا

Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.