مقام کاروان سبایا امام حسین علیہ السلام، عین التمر

محمد بن جرير الطبري

أحداث سنة ٦١هـ ورحلة أهل البيت بعد كربلاء؛ الصفحات

Page/Volume: أحداث سنة ٦١هـ ورحلة أهل البيت بعد كربلاء؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: أحداث سنة ٦١هـ ورحلة السبايا؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: أخبار كربلاء والسبي والعودة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: رحلة السبايا والعودة إلى المدينة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route.

علي بن محمد ابن الأثير

أحداث سنة ٦١هـ ورحلة السبايا؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلا

Page/Volume: أحداث سنة ٦١هـ ورحلة أهل البيت بعد كربلاء؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: أحداث سنة ٦١هـ ورحلة السبايا؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: أخبار كربلاء والسبي والعودة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: رحلة السبايا والعودة إلى المدينة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route.

محمد بن محمد المفيد

أخبار كربلاء والسبي والعودة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف

Page/Volume: أحداث سنة ٦١هـ ورحلة أهل البيت بعد كربلاء؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: أحداث سنة ٦١هـ ورحلة السبايا؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: أخبار كربلاء والسبي والعودة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: رحلة السبايا والعودة إلى المدينة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route.

علي بن موسى ابن طاووس

رحلة السبايا والعودة إلى المدينة؛ الصفحات تختلف با

Page/Volume: أحداث سنة ٦١هـ ورحلة أهل البيت بعد كربلاء؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: أحداث سنة ٦١هـ ورحلة السبايا؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: أخبار كربلاء والسبي والعودة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: رحلة السبايا والعودة إلى المدينة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route.

Page/Volume: أحداث سنة ٦١هـ ورحلة أهل البيت بعد كربلاء؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: أحداث سنة ٦١هـ ورحلة السبايا؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: أخبار كربلاء والسبي والعودة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: رحلة السبايا والعودة إلى المدينة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route.

Page/Volume: أحداث سنة ٦١هـ ورحلة أهل البيت بعد كربلاء؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: أحداث سنة ٦١هـ ورحلة السبايا؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: أخبار كربلاء والسبي والعودة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Page/Volume: رحلة السبايا والعودة إلى المدينة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route. | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / NOT A BURIAL / UNDER REVIEW. Classical histories support the captivity journey from Karbala to Kufa and Damascus and the later return toward Medina, but they do not securely establish a halt at Al-Khasif near Ayn al-Tamr. The exact site is supported by later local heritage and devotional memory. The article therefore preserves the place as a real local maqam while stating clearly that it is neither a burial place nor a proven station of the earliest route.