مقام حضرت دانیال علیہ السلام دیالی

تعارف

حوالہ جات

بنیادی ماخذ — سفر دانيال زیادہ

Notes: The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: خبر دانيال والجسد المنسوب إليه؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: قصص الأنبياء وخبر دانيال؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: مواد شوش وتستر والمواضع المنسوبة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial.

بنیادی ماخذ — تاريخ الرسل والملوك زیادہ

Notes: The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: خبر دانيال والجسد المنسوب إليه؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: قصص الأنبياء وخبر دانيال؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: مواد شوش وتستر والمواضع المنسوبة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial.

بنیادی ماخذ — البداية والنهاية زیادہ

Notes: The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: خبر دانيال والجسد المنسوب إليه؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: قصص الأنبياء وخبر دانيال؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: مواد شوش وتستر والمواضع المنسوبة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial.

ثانوی ماخذ — معجم البلدان درمیانہ

Notes: The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: خبر دانيال والجسد المنسوب إليه؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: قصص الأنبياء وخبر دانيال؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: مواد شوش وتستر والمواضع المنسوبة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial.

ثانوی ماخذ — قصص الأنبياء درمیانہ

Notes: The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: خبر دانيال والجسد المنسوب إليه؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: قصص الأنبياء وخبر دانيال؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: مواد شوش وتستر والمواضع المنسوبة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial.

ویب ماخذ — www.alsumaria.tv درمیانہ

Notes: The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: خبر دانيال والجسد المنسوب إليه؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: قصص الأنبياء وخبر دانيال؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: مواد شوش وتستر والمواضع المنسوبة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial.

ویب ماخذ — visitiran.ir درمیانہ

Notes: The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: خبر دانيال والجسد المنسوب إليه؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: قصص الأنبياء وخبر دانيال؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: مواد شوش وتستر والمواضع المنسوبة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial.

قریبی مزارات

متعلقہ شخصیات و مقامات