दियाला में हज़रत दानियाल अलैहिस्सलाम से संबद्ध मक़ाम

परिचय

संदर्भ

प्राथमिक स्रोत — سفر دانيال उच्च

Notes: The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: خبر دانيال والجسد المنسوب إليه؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: قصص الأنبياء وخبر دانيال؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: مواد شوش وتستر والمواضع المنسوبة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial.

प्राथमिक स्रोत — تاريخ الرسل والملوك उच्च

Notes: The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: خبر دانيال والجسد المنسوب إليه؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: قصص الأنبياء وخبر دانيال؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: مواد شوش وتستر والمواضع المنسوبة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial.

प्राथमिक स्रोत — البداية والنهاية उच्च

Notes: The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: خبر دانيال والجسد المنسوب إليه؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: قصص الأنبياء وخبر دانيال؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: مواد شوش وتستر والمواضع المنسوبة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial.

द्वितीयक स्रोत — معجم البلدان मध्यम

Notes: The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: خبر دانيال والجسد المنسوب إليه؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: قصص الأنبياء وخبر دانيال؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: مواد شوش وتستر والمواضع المنسوبة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial.

द्वितीयक स्रोत — قصص الأنبياء मध्यम

Notes: The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: خبر دانيال والجسد المنسوب إليه؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: قصص الأنبياء وخبر دانيال؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: مواد شوش وتستر والمواضع المنسوبة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial.

वेब स्रोत — www.alsumaria.tv मध्यम

Notes: The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: خبر دانيال والجسد المنسوب إليه؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: قصص الأنبياء وخبر دانيال؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: مواد شوش وتستر والمواضع المنسوبة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial.

वेब स्रोत — visitiran.ir मध्यम

Notes: The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: خبر دانيال والجسد المنسوب إليه؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: قصص الأنبياء وخبر دانيال؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial. | Page/Volume: مواد شوش وتستر والمواضع المنسوبة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | The Alsumaria report supports the present Al-Akr shrine, surrounding cemetery, approximately twenty-kilometre relation to Baqubah, bridge collapse, and villagers' 2018 access work. Visit Iran supports Susa as a recognized Daniel-tomb tradition, demonstrating that the Diyala site is one among several attributed locations. The Book of Daniel supports the lions' den narrative, which is explicitly identified as Biblical moral tradition rather than a Qur'anic or definitive hadith event. Al-Tabari, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Mu'jam al-Buldan, and Qisas al-Anbiya provide Islamic historical and geographical memory, not proof of the Al-Akr burial.

निकटवर्ती दरगाहें

संबंधित व्यक्ति और स्थान