Date and place of birth are unknown. He belonged to the late second- and early third-century Hijri family setting of Imam Musa al-Kazim.
Hamza ibn Musa al-Kazim
Genealogy research note — view details
Genealogical sources differ over the number and names of Imam Musa al-Kazim's children; these 37 names are retained at a possible level according to the specific list in al-Irshad.
PER-000128
Ahl al-Bayt
Probable
Burial place unknown
Imami source baseline
⚙️ Print, share, and more tools
Hamza ibn Musa al-Kazim was a son of Imam Musa ibn Ja'far al-Kazim and a brother of Imam Ali al-Rida. Classical genealogical works identify him by the kunya Abu al-Qasim, describe him as connected with Kufa, and trace surviving descendants through his sons al-Qasim and Hamza. Reliable details of his personal career, birth, death and burial are scarce, and the shrines attributed to him in Iran represent later local traditions rather than a historically verified grave.
Date, place and cause of death are not reliably recorded in the early genealogical sources.
Burial unknown. The shrine at Ray near Abd al-Azim al-Hasani is the best-known later attribution, while Qom, Sirjan and Kashmar also preserve local claims. None is established by sufficiently early evidence as his confirmed grave.
Biography and historical profile
Hamza ibn Musa al-Kazim belonged to the Musawi branch of the Prophet's family. Genealogical authorities name him among the sons of Imam Musa ibn Ja'far al-Kazim. His identity is strengthened by agreement on his father, his kunya Abu al-Qasim, his Kufan association and the named lines of his descendants; these details help distinguish him from later descendants who also bore the name Hamza.
The sources do not preserve a reliable date or place of birth. Ibn Inaba states that Hamza's mother was an unnamed umm walad. Since his father died in the late second Islamic century and his brother Ali al-Rida lived into the early third century, Hamza belongs historically to the same late second- and early third-century Hijri family setting, but a more precise chronology should not be invented.
Umdat al-Talib describes him as Abu al-Qasim, a Kufan, and records that his continuing lineage came through two sons, al-Qasim and Hamza. It also mentions a son named Ali who died without surviving descendants and whose attributed grave was known outside the Istakhr Gate of Shiraz. Al-Shajara al-Mubaraka independently confirms the two principal lines through al-Qasim and Hamza and traces branches of their descendants in Persian lands.
Later genealogical and devotional writings praise Hamza as a respected and devout Alid and sometimes attach additional stories to his life. Such portrayals reflect his later religious memory, but the early genealogical record does not provide enough evidence to reconstruct a detailed scholarly, political or travel biography. Claims that he certainly accompanied Imam al-Rida to Khurasan or held a defined public office should therefore be presented only as later reports when specifically sourced.
No dependable early source gives Hamza's death date or conclusively identifies his burial place. The best-known later attribution places his grave at Ray, within the shrine complex associated with Abd al-Azim al-Hasani, while other local traditions have linked his name with Qom, Sirjan and Kashmar. Because these claims are late and competing, the historically safe classification is burial unknown, with several attributed shrines or maqams rather than a confirmed tomb.
The sources do not preserve a reliable date or place of birth. Ibn Inaba states that Hamza's mother was an unnamed umm walad. Since his father died in the late second Islamic century and his brother Ali al-Rida lived into the early third century, Hamza belongs historically to the same late second- and early third-century Hijri family setting, but a more precise chronology should not be invented.
Umdat al-Talib describes him as Abu al-Qasim, a Kufan, and records that his continuing lineage came through two sons, al-Qasim and Hamza. It also mentions a son named Ali who died without surviving descendants and whose attributed grave was known outside the Istakhr Gate of Shiraz. Al-Shajara al-Mubaraka independently confirms the two principal lines through al-Qasim and Hamza and traces branches of their descendants in Persian lands.
Later genealogical and devotional writings praise Hamza as a respected and devout Alid and sometimes attach additional stories to his life. Such portrayals reflect his later religious memory, but the early genealogical record does not provide enough evidence to reconstruct a detailed scholarly, political or travel biography. Claims that he certainly accompanied Imam al-Rida to Khurasan or held a defined public office should therefore be presented only as later reports when specifically sourced.
No dependable early source gives Hamza's death date or conclusively identifies his burial place. The best-known later attribution places his grave at Ray, within the shrine complex associated with Abd al-Azim al-Hasani, while other local traditions have linked his name with Qom, Sirjan and Kashmar. Because these claims are late and competing, the historically safe classification is burial unknown, with several attributed shrines or maqams rather than a confirmed tomb.
Historical importance and legacy
Hamza is historically important mainly for genealogy. Through al-Qasim and Hamza, his branch contributed to the wider network of Musawi Sayyids in Iraq, Khurasan and other Persian regions. Classical genealogists preserve these lines with enough detail to establish his place within the family of Imam Musa al-Kazim even though his individual biography remains thin.
His case is also important for responsible shrine documentation. A secure genealogical identity does not automatically verify a local grave. Recording the Ray, Kashmar, Qom or Sirjan sites as attributed traditions, while keeping the actual burial unknown, preserves devotional heritage without converting later claims into historical certainty.
His case is also important for responsible shrine documentation. A secure genealogical identity does not automatically verify a local grave. Recording the Ray, Kashmar, Qom or Sirjan sites as attributed traditions, while keeping the actual burial unknown, preserves devotional heritage without converting later claims into historical certainty.
Family relationships
👪 Parents
Father
Imam Musa al-Kazim
Probable
🌱 Children
Sources
Umdat al-Talib fi Ansab Al Abi Talib | Ibn Inaba | Vol. 1, p. 228 | https://ar.lib.eshia.ir/10392/1/228 | Kunya Abu al-Qasim, Kufan association, mother as an unnamed umm walad, sons and surviving lineageAl-Shajara al-Mubaraka fi Ansab al-Talibiyya | Fakhr al-Din al-Razi | Vol. 1, p. 109 | https://ar.lib.eshia.ir/86520/1/109 | Lineage continuing through al-Qasim and Hamza and later descendant branches
Tuhfat al-Azhar wa Zulal al-Anhar | Damin ibn Shadqam al-Husayni | Vol. 3, p. 322 | https://lib.eshia.ir/86678/3/322 | Later characterization; manuscripts leave birth date blank and preserve later biographical reports
Kitab al-Mazar | Sayyid Mahdi al-Qazwini | Vol. 1, p. 181 | https://ar.lib.eshia.ir/13143/1/181 | Later attribution of a grave at Ray; used as evidence of tradition, not proof of burial
Gallery
No approved images yet.
📤 Submit a photo of this person or place
The image will remain private until approved.
💬 Visitor comments
No approved comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Comments are published after administrator approval.