مرقد أولاد مسلم بن عقيل، محمد وإبراهيم رحمة الله عليهما

التعريف

المراجع

مصدر أولي — الأمالي مرتفع

Notes: Al-Amali by al-Saduq is the principal source for the famous detailed account of Muhammad al-Asghar and Ibrahim; it is a later devotional/maqtal transmission and its details are not treated as uncontested early history. The Hillah Heritage Center and the Saraer study support the present Al-Musayib location, the disagreement over killing versus burial, the two-domed architecture, damage in 1917, and restorations in 1956, 1962, and 1974. Al-Irshad and al-Tabari provide the wider Muslim ibn Aqil and Karbala context but do not independently establish every detail of the children's story. | Page/Volume: خبر مسلم بن عقيل وأحداث الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Amali by al-Saduq is the principal source for the famous detailed account of Muhammad al-Asghar and Ibrahim; it is a later devotional/maqtal transmission and its details are not treated as uncontested early history. The Hillah Heritage Center and the Saraer study support the present Al-Musayib location, the disagreement over killing versus burial, the two-domed architecture, damage in 1917, and restorations in 1956, 1962, and 1974. Al-Irshad and al-Tabari provide the wider Muslim ibn Aqil and Karbala context but do not independently establish every detail of the children's story.

مصدر أولي — الإرشاد في معرفة حجج الله على العباد مرتفع

Notes: Al-Amali by al-Saduq is the principal source for the famous detailed account of Muhammad al-Asghar and Ibrahim; it is a later devotional/maqtal transmission and its details are not treated as uncontested early history. The Hillah Heritage Center and the Saraer study support the present Al-Musayib location, the disagreement over killing versus burial, the two-domed architecture, damage in 1917, and restorations in 1956, 1962, and 1974. Al-Irshad and al-Tabari provide the wider Muslim ibn Aqil and Karbala context but do not independently establish every detail of the children's story. | Page/Volume: خبر مسلم بن عقيل وأحداث الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Amali by al-Saduq is the principal source for the famous detailed account of Muhammad al-Asghar and Ibrahim; it is a later devotional/maqtal transmission and its details are not treated as uncontested early history. The Hillah Heritage Center and the Saraer study support the present Al-Musayib location, the disagreement over killing versus burial, the two-domed architecture, damage in 1917, and restorations in 1956, 1962, and 1974. Al-Irshad and al-Tabari provide the wider Muslim ibn Aqil and Karbala context but do not independently establish every detail of the children's story.

مصدر أولي — تاريخ الرسل والملوك مرتفع

Notes: Al-Amali by al-Saduq is the principal source for the famous detailed account of Muhammad al-Asghar and Ibrahim; it is a later devotional/maqtal transmission and its details are not treated as uncontested early history. The Hillah Heritage Center and the Saraer study support the present Al-Musayib location, the disagreement over killing versus burial, the two-domed architecture, damage in 1917, and restorations in 1956, 1962, and 1974. Al-Irshad and al-Tabari provide the wider Muslim ibn Aqil and Karbala context but do not independently establish every detail of the children's story. | Page/Volume: خبر مسلم بن عقيل وأحداث الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Amali by al-Saduq is the principal source for the famous detailed account of Muhammad al-Asghar and Ibrahim; it is a later devotional/maqtal transmission and its details are not treated as uncontested early history. The Hillah Heritage Center and the Saraer study support the present Al-Musayib location, the disagreement over killing versus burial, the two-domed architecture, damage in 1917, and restorations in 1956, 1962, and 1974. Al-Irshad and al-Tabari provide the wider Muslim ibn Aqil and Karbala context but do not independently establish every detail of the children's story.

مصدر ثانوي — الشهيد مسلم بن عقيل متوسط

Notes: Al-Amali by al-Saduq is the principal source for the famous detailed account of Muhammad al-Asghar and Ibrahim; it is a later devotional/maqtal transmission and its details are not treated as uncontested early history. The Hillah Heritage Center and the Saraer study support the present Al-Musayib location, the disagreement over killing versus burial, the two-domed architecture, damage in 1917, and restorations in 1956, 1962, and 1974. Al-Irshad and al-Tabari provide the wider Muslim ibn Aqil and Karbala context but do not independently establish every detail of the children's story. | Page/Volume: خبر مسلم بن عقيل وأحداث الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Amali by al-Saduq is the principal source for the famous detailed account of Muhammad al-Asghar and Ibrahim; it is a later devotional/maqtal transmission and its details are not treated as uncontested early history. The Hillah Heritage Center and the Saraer study support the present Al-Musayib location, the disagreement over killing versus burial, the two-domed architecture, damage in 1917, and restorations in 1956, 1962, and 1974. Al-Irshad and al-Tabari provide the wider Muslim ibn Aqil and Karbala context but do not independently establish every detail of the children's story.

مصدر ثانوي — مشاهد العترة الطاهرة متوسط

Notes: Al-Amali by al-Saduq is the principal source for the famous detailed account of Muhammad al-Asghar and Ibrahim; it is a later devotional/maqtal transmission and its details are not treated as uncontested early history. The Hillah Heritage Center and the Saraer study support the present Al-Musayib location, the disagreement over killing versus burial, the two-domed architecture, damage in 1917, and restorations in 1956, 1962, and 1974. Al-Irshad and al-Tabari provide the wider Muslim ibn Aqil and Karbala context but do not independently establish every detail of the children's story. | Page/Volume: خبر مسلم بن عقيل وأحداث الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Amali by al-Saduq is the principal source for the famous detailed account of Muhammad al-Asghar and Ibrahim; it is a later devotional/maqtal transmission and its details are not treated as uncontested early history. The Hillah Heritage Center and the Saraer study support the present Al-Musayib location, the disagreement over killing versus burial, the two-domed architecture, damage in 1917, and restorations in 1956, 1962, and 1974. Al-Irshad and al-Tabari provide the wider Muslim ibn Aqil and Karbala context but do not independently establish every detail of the children's story.

مصدر ثانوي — مراقد المعارف متوسط

Notes: Al-Amali by al-Saduq is the principal source for the famous detailed account of Muhammad al-Asghar and Ibrahim; it is a later devotional/maqtal transmission and its details are not treated as uncontested early history. The Hillah Heritage Center and the Saraer study support the present Al-Musayib location, the disagreement over killing versus burial, the two-domed architecture, damage in 1917, and restorations in 1956, 1962, and 1974. Al-Irshad and al-Tabari provide the wider Muslim ibn Aqil and Karbala context but do not independently establish every detail of the children's story. | Page/Volume: خبر مسلم بن عقيل وأحداث الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Amali by al-Saduq is the principal source for the famous detailed account of Muhammad al-Asghar and Ibrahim; it is a later devotional/maqtal transmission and its details are not treated as uncontested early history. The Hillah Heritage Center and the Saraer study support the present Al-Musayib location, the disagreement over killing versus burial, the two-domed architecture, damage in 1917, and restorations in 1956, 1962, and 1974. Al-Irshad and al-Tabari provide the wider Muslim ibn Aqil and Karbala context but do not independently establish every detail of the children's story.

مصدر إلكتروني — mk.iq متوسط

Notes: Al-Amali by al-Saduq is the principal source for the famous detailed account of Muhammad al-Asghar and Ibrahim; it is a later devotional/maqtal transmission and its details are not treated as uncontested early history. The Hillah Heritage Center and the Saraer study support the present Al-Musayib location, the disagreement over killing versus burial, the two-domed architecture, damage in 1917, and restorations in 1956, 1962, and 1974. Al-Irshad and al-Tabari provide the wider Muslim ibn Aqil and Karbala context but do not independently establish every detail of the children's story. | Page/Volume: خبر مسلم بن عقيل وأحداث الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Amali by al-Saduq is the principal source for the famous detailed account of Muhammad al-Asghar and Ibrahim; it is a later devotional/maqtal transmission and its details are not treated as uncontested early history. The Hillah Heritage Center and the Saraer study support the present Al-Musayib location, the disagreement over killing versus burial, the two-domed architecture, damage in 1917, and restorations in 1956, 1962, and 1974. Al-Irshad and al-Tabari provide the wider Muslim ibn Aqil and Karbala context but do not independently establish every detail of the children's story.

مصدر إلكتروني — saraer.org متوسط

Notes: Al-Amali by al-Saduq is the principal source for the famous detailed account of Muhammad al-Asghar and Ibrahim; it is a later devotional/maqtal transmission and its details are not treated as uncontested early history. The Hillah Heritage Center and the Saraer study support the present Al-Musayib location, the disagreement over killing versus burial, the two-domed architecture, damage in 1917, and restorations in 1956, 1962, and 1974. Al-Irshad and al-Tabari provide the wider Muslim ibn Aqil and Karbala context but do not independently establish every detail of the children's story. | Page/Volume: خبر مسلم بن عقيل وأحداث الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Amali by al-Saduq is the principal source for the famous detailed account of Muhammad al-Asghar and Ibrahim; it is a later devotional/maqtal transmission and its details are not treated as uncontested early history. The Hillah Heritage Center and the Saraer study support the present Al-Musayib location, the disagreement over killing versus burial, the two-domed architecture, damage in 1917, and restorations in 1956, 1962, and 1974. Al-Irshad and al-Tabari provide the wider Muslim ibn Aqil and Karbala context but do not independently establish every detail of the children's story.

المزارات القريبة

الشخصيات والمواقع المرتبطة