No reliable date or place of birth is preserved.
Ibrahim al-Akbar ibn Musa al-Kazim
Genealogy research note — view details
Specialist genealogical sources distinguish him as Ibrahim al-Akbar from Ibrahim al-Asghar al-Murtada. Ibn Inaba and some genealogical reports assign the Yemen political activity to the elder, while other genealogists assign it to the younger; the exact Yemen identity remains disputed.
PER-000195
Ahl al-Bayt
Probable
Disputed place
Imami source baseline
⚙️ Print, share, and more tools
Specialist genealogical sources distinguish Ibrahim al-Akbar ibn Imam Musa al-Kazim from Ibrahim al-Asghar al-Murtada. Ibn Inaba and a report transmitted from Abu Nasr al-Bukhari associate the Ibrahim ibn Musa active in Yemen around 200 AH with the elder, while Abu al-Hasan al-Umari and other genealogists assign the same figure to the younger. Early political chronicles name only Ibrahim ibn Musa ibn Jafar and do not identify him as elder or younger. The Yemen and 202 AH Meccan activity is therefore presented as a strong but disputed attribution to Ibrahim al-Akbar. His mother, definitive descendants, death, and burial are not securely established.
No reliable date, place, or cause of death is established. Later death and poisoning reports generally concern Ibrahim al-Murtada or an undifferentiated Ibrahim.
Burial is unknown. Later attributions to Baghdad, al-Kazimiyya, or Karbala do not provide sufficiently early or decisive evidence for this distinct identity.
Biography and historical profile
Ibrahim al-Akbar is counted among the sons of Imam Musa al-Kazim whom specialist Talibid genealogists distinguish from another son named Ibrahim, Ibrahim al-Asghar al-Murtada. Earlier general biographical works often name only one Ibrahim, but Bahr al-Ulum explains that naming one does not explicitly deny a second and that the specialist genealogists' express distinction deserves greater weight.
In Umdat al-Talib, Ibn Inaba calls him Ibrahim al-Akbar and associates him with the figure who appeared in Yemen during the Abu al-Saraya movement. The same genealogical discussion preserves disagreement about his descendants, while the younger Ibrahim's continuing line is treated separately and more securely. It is therefore unsafe to attach a definite descendant branch to Ibrahim al-Akbar.
Al-Tabari, Ibn al-Athir, and later historical summaries report that an Ibrahim ibn Musa ibn Jafar left Mecca for Yemen and acquired authority there in 200 AH. The same undifferentiated name appears in connection with pilgrimage and political authority in Mecca in 202 AH. These chronicles do not say elder or younger, so the events are retained here only as a strong genealogical attribution that remains explicitly disputed.
Some political chronicles call him al-Jazzar and accuse the Yemen ruler of harsh killing, captivity, and seizure of property. This is a hostile narrative designation, not a neutral personal title. It is therefore retained only with source attribution and is not converted into a sectarian or moral verdict.
No reliable exact birth date, mother, definitive descendants, date or place of death, or burial is established for him. Later grave claims in Baghdad, al-Kazimiyya, or Karbala generally concern Ibrahim al-Asghar al-Murtada or an undifferentiated Ibrahim identity. The present record keeps shrine and geographic linkage blank and records burial as unknown.
In Umdat al-Talib, Ibn Inaba calls him Ibrahim al-Akbar and associates him with the figure who appeared in Yemen during the Abu al-Saraya movement. The same genealogical discussion preserves disagreement about his descendants, while the younger Ibrahim's continuing line is treated separately and more securely. It is therefore unsafe to attach a definite descendant branch to Ibrahim al-Akbar.
Al-Tabari, Ibn al-Athir, and later historical summaries report that an Ibrahim ibn Musa ibn Jafar left Mecca for Yemen and acquired authority there in 200 AH. The same undifferentiated name appears in connection with pilgrimage and political authority in Mecca in 202 AH. These chronicles do not say elder or younger, so the events are retained here only as a strong genealogical attribution that remains explicitly disputed.
Some political chronicles call him al-Jazzar and accuse the Yemen ruler of harsh killing, captivity, and seizure of property. This is a hostile narrative designation, not a neutral personal title. It is therefore retained only with source attribution and is not converted into a sectarian or moral verdict.
No reliable exact birth date, mother, definitive descendants, date or place of death, or burial is established for him. Later grave claims in Baghdad, al-Kazimiyya, or Karbala generally concern Ibrahim al-Asghar al-Murtada or an undifferentiated Ibrahim identity. The present record keeps shrine and geographic linkage blank and records burial as unknown.
Historical importance and legacy
Ibrahim al-Akbar matters for the study of Ahl al-Bayt-linked political movements and the struggle over Yemen and the Hijaz in the early Abbasid period. If the Yemen Ibrahim is correctly identified with him, he was an important regional Alid authority after the Abu al-Saraya rising.
His profile is a clear example of the difference between a chronicle's named actor and a later genealogical identification. The chronicles describe the activity of an Ibrahim ibn Musa, while specialist genealogists divide the name between two persons and disagree over the political attribution itself.
His legacy is therefore best presented not as an unquestionably identified ruler, progenitor, or buried saint, but as a distinct genealogical identity carrying a strong yet disputed political attribution and clearly stated limits of evidence.
His profile is a clear example of the difference between a chronicle's named actor and a later genealogical identification. The chronicles describe the activity of an Ibrahim ibn Musa, while specialist genealogists divide the name between two persons and disagree over the political attribution itself.
His legacy is therefore best presented not as an unquestionably identified ruler, progenitor, or buried saint, but as a distinct genealogical identity carrying a strong yet disputed political attribution and clearly stated limits of evidence.
Family relationships
👪 Parents
Father
Imam Musa al-Kazim
Probable
Sources
Umdat al-Talib fi Ansab Al Abi Talib | Ibn Inaba | p. 180 in the displayed edition; pagination varies | https://www.masaha.org/book/view/2302/page/180 | Distinguishes Ibrahim al-Akbar from Ibrahim al-Asghar and assigns the Yemen appearance to the elder in this genealogyAl-Fawa'id al-Rijaliyya | al-Sayyid Mahdi Bahr al-Ulum | Vol. 1, pp. 421–434; pagination varies | https://www.masaha.org/book/view/3499/page/421 | Reviews the one-or-two-Ibrahim question and gives weight to specialist genealogists
Al-Fawa'id al-Rijaliyya | al-Sayyid Mahdi Bahr al-Ulum | Vol. 1, p. 433 | https://www.masaha.org/book/view/3499/page/433 | Records the elder-versus-younger disagreement surrounding the Abu al-Saraya and Yemen figure
A'yan al-Shi'a | Muhsin al-Amin | Vol. 2, pp. 228–229 | https://ablibrary.net/book_content/74/228 | Summarizes the evidence for two Ibrahims and the unresolved Yemen identification
Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk, events of 200 AH | Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari | Year 200 entry; pagination varies by edition | https://www.islamweb.net/ar/library/content/200/19206/ | Names Ibrahim ibn Musa ibn Jafar in Yemen without identifying elder or younger
Al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh | Izz al-Din Ibn al-Athir | Events of 200 AH; pagination varies by edition | https://www.islamweb.net/ar/library/content/126/1194/ | Independent chronicle account of Ibrahim ibn Musa's seizure of Yemen and the hostile al-Jazzar report
Historical events of 202 AH | Classical chronicle compilation | Year 202 entry; pagination varies | https://www.islamweb.net/ar/library/content/200/19237/ | Records Ibrahim ibn Musa's Meccan pilgrimage and political role without elder-younger identification
Gallery
No approved images yet.
📤 Submit a photo of this person or place
The image will remain private until approved.
💬 Visitor comments
No approved comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Comments are published after administrator approval.