औन बिन अली से संबद्ध रौज़ा
اردو العربية English فارسی हिन्दी
मक़ाम औन बिन अली; औन अल-असग़र का रौज़ा; दौहत अल-औन
इन चिह्नों का अर्थ
चिह्न संदर्भों, संबद्धता टिप्पणियों और GPS मेटाडेटा के आधार पर सावधानी से दिखाए जाते हैं; ये अंतिम ऐतिहासिक निर्णय नहीं हैं।
⚙️ प्रिंट, साझा और अन्य विकल्प
परिचय
बाबिल प्रांत के अल-हाशिमिय्या ज़िले की अल-मिद्हतिय्या तहसील के अल-बाशियाह गाँव में स्थित यह रौज़ा औन बिन अली से जुड़ा एक पुराना स्थानीय मक़ाम है। सत्यापित भौगोलिक निर्देशांक और निरंतर ज़ियारत भौतिक स्थल तथा उसकी वर्तमान पहचान को सिद्ध करते हैं, लेकिन वे अपने आप दफ़न व्यक्ति की निश्चित पहचान सिद्ध नहीं करते। इसलिए अभिलेख को निर्विवाद मुख्य क़ब्र के बजाय द्वितीयक संबद्ध मक़ाम माना गया है।
प्रारंभिक ज़ैदी वंशावली ग्रंथ अल-इफ़ादा फ़ी तारीख़ अइम्मत अल-सादा के उपलब्ध डिजिटल संस्करण के पृष्ठ २६ में यह्या और औन को इमाम अली बिन अबी तालिब के पुत्रों में रखा गया है, उनकी माता अस्मा बिन्त उमैस बताई गई हैं और कहा गया है कि दोनों बचपन में चल बसे। अल-मक़रीज़ी की बाद की वंशावली संक्षिप्ति इत्तिआज़ अल-हुनफ़ा भी यह्या और औन को अस्मा से अली के पुत्र बताती है। ये स्रोत औन नाम के पुत्र की एक वंशावली परंपरा का समर्थन करते हैं, लेकिन उसे अल-बाशियाह से नहीं जोड़ते और न वयस्क सैनिक जीवन बताते हैं।
दूसरे प्रारंभिक वंशावली ग्रंथ अलग व्यवस्था सुरक्षित करते हैं। नसब क़ुरैश, पृष्ठ ७६, अब्दुल्लाह, मुहम्मद और औन को जाफ़र बिन अबी तालिब के पुत्र और अस्मा बिन्त उमैस की संतान बताती है। अली बिन ज़ैद अल-बैहक़ी की लुबाब अल-अंसाब भी अस्मा से अली के पुत्र के रूप में केवल यह्या का नाम लेती है और अब्दुल्लाह, मुहम्मद तथा औन को जाफ़र की संतान कहती है। यह मतभेद बताता है कि औन बिन अली की पहचान में सावधानी क्यों आवश्यक है और स्थानीय औन अल-असग़र नाम को सर्वमान्य प्राचीन नाम क्यों नहीं माना जा सकता।
इस मक़ाम को अब्दुल्लाह बिन जाफ़र के परिवार में औन नाम वाले व्यक्तियों से भी अलग रखना चाहिए। मक़ातिल अल-तालिबिय्यीन के डिजिटल संस्करण के पृष्ठ ११८ में औन बिन अब्दुल्लाह बिन जाफ़र का वर्णन है और औन अल-असग़र को कर्बला की रिवायतों से जुड़े दूसरे औन से अलग किया गया है। बाद के वंशावली ग्रंथ भी तालिबी परिवार की अलग शाखाओं में औन नाम के कई व्यक्तियों का उल्लेख करते हैं। इसलिए केवल समान नाम के कारण अल-बाशियाह के रौज़े को अधिक स्पष्ट कर्बलाई व्यक्तियों के साथ नहीं मिलाया जा सकता।
भौतिक रौज़े का लिखित इतिहास आरंभिक आधुनिक और उस्मानी काल के स्रोतों में अधिक स्पष्ट होता है। हिल्ला विरासत केंद्र ने मुर्तज़ा आल नज़्मी ज़ादा अल-बग़दादी का विवरण उद्धृत किया है, जिसमें अल-बाशियाह में औन बिन अली से संबद्ध प्रसिद्ध ज़ियारतगाह का उल्लेख है। केंद्र ने मुस्तफ़ा अल-सिद्दीक़ी अल-ख़लवती की इराक़ यात्रा में ११३९ हिजरी के दौरान दौहत अल-औन से गुज़रने का विवरण तथा यासीन अल-उमरी और सफ़ा अल-दीन अल-बंदनीजी के उल्लेख भी दिए हैं। ये विवरण सिद्ध करते हैं कि स्थान की संबद्धता और ज़ियारत कई सदियों से प्रसिद्ध थी।
ये बाद के उल्लेख दफ़न व्यक्ति की जैविक पहचान की तुलना में रौज़े की प्राचीनता और स्थानीय परंपरा की निरंतरता को अधिक मज़बूती से सिद्ध करते हैं। उनकी भाषा सामान्यतः वही नाम दोहराती है जिससे मक़ाम ज़ायरीन में प्रसिद्ध था और पहली हिजरी सदी से क़ब्र तक निरंतर दस्तावेज़ी शृंखला नहीं देती। इसी कारण लेख ऐतिहासिक नाम, धार्मिक स्मृति और पुराने भवन का इतिहास सुरक्षित रखता है, लेकिन सटीक वंश तथा दफ़न पहचान को समीक्षा के अंतर्गत रखता है।
इराक़ी मीडिया नेटवर्क की हाल की मैदानी रिपोर्ट वर्तमान संरक्षक परंपरा दर्ज करती है कि औन का जन्म १६ हिजरी में हुआ, उन्होंने नहरवान में युद्ध किया, ३८ हिजरी में घावों के कारण निधन हुआ और इसी स्थान पर दफ़न हुए, जबकि नौ सफ़र को स्मरण किया जाता है। यह स्थल की आज की मौखिक और संस्थागत कथा का महत्वपूर्ण प्रमाण है। लेकिन इस शोध में उपयोग किए गए प्रारंभिक वंशावली स्रोत या तो औन के बचपन में निधन की बात करते हैं या इस पर अलग हैं कि वे अली के पुत्र थे या जाफ़र के, और वे नहरवान वाली जीवनी नहीं देते। इसलिए जन्म, शहादत और दफ़न की यह कथा आधुनिक स्थानीय परंपरा के रूप में सुरक्षित है, स्थापित प्रारंभिक इतिहास के रूप में नहीं।
भौतिक परिसर का अपना स्वतंत्र विरासत इतिहास है। हिल्ला विरासत केंद्र के अनुसार पुराने भवन का पुनर्निर्माण स्थानीय लोगों ने १९५७ ईस्वी में किया, आँगन १९६० में बनाया गया और जुलाई २०१४ में बड़े पुनर्निर्माण के लिए रौज़ा गिराया गया। २०२६ की रिपोर्ट १९३८ के भूमि निपटान निर्णय, २०११ में शिया मज़ारों की सामान्य सचिवालय के प्रशासन में प्रवेश और आधुनिक निर्माण के दौरान एक पुरानी गुम्बद को सुरक्षित रखने का भी उल्लेख करती है। ये विवरण संस्था और वास्तुकला की निरंतरता दिखाते हैं, पहली सदी की दफ़न समस्या हल नहीं करते।
इसलिए इस अभिलेख का ऐतिहासिक मूल्य तीन अलग स्तरों में है: औन नामक व्यक्ति की विवादित वंशावली स्मृति, अल-बाशियाह में आरंभिक आधुनिक और उस्मानी युग से दस्तावेज़ित ज़ियारत परंपरा, और सत्यापित भूगोल तथा सामुदायिक गतिविधि वाला जीवित आधुनिक रौज़ा। इन स्तरों को अलग रखने से श्रद्धा और ऐतिहासिक शुद्धता दोनों सुरक्षित रहती हैं। स्थल को औन बिन अली से संबद्ध मक़ाम के रूप में सम्मानपूर्वक दर्ज और ज़ियारत किया जा सकता है, जबकि निश्चित क़ब्र का दर्जा पाने के लिए प्राचीन शिलालेख, वक़्फ़नामा, पुरातात्त्विक प्रमाण या सीधी निरंतर दस्तावेज़ी शृंखला आवश्यक होगी।
👨👦 पिता की ओर से
👩👧 माता की ओर से
🗺 यात्रा क्रम
📚 पुस्तकें
ऐतिहासिक / धार्मिक महत्व
रौज़े का पहला ऐतिहासिक महत्त्व एक स्थानीय अलवी संबद्धता के जीवित रहने में है, जिसका लिखित अभिलेख आरंभिक आधुनिक और उस्मानी युग के लेखकों तक पहुँचता है। दफ़न व्यक्ति की पहचान अनिश्चित होने पर भी नाम, ज़ियारत और वास्तुकला की निरंतरता बाबिल के धार्मिक इतिहास का स्वतंत्र भाग है।
इसका दूसरा महत्त्व वंशावली शोध में है। एक ओर अल-इफ़ादा और अल-मक़रीज़ी, तथा दूसरी ओर नसब क़ुरैश और लुबाब अल-अंसाब का मतभेद दिखाता है कि अस्मा बिन्त उमैस के साझा संबंध के कारण अली और जाफ़र की संतानों में भ्रम कैसे हो सकता था। इसलिए यह रौज़ा डेटाबेस में व्यक्ति-पहचान अलग करने का व्यावहारिक उदाहरण है।
आधुनिक नहरवान कथा जीवित सामुदायिक स्मृति के रूप में महत्वपूर्ण है, लेकिन उसे स्पष्ट संबद्धता के साथ रखना चाहिए। जन्म, युद्ध और शहादत की तिथियों को पहली सदी के सिद्ध इतिहास के बजाय वर्तमान संरक्षक परंपरा मानना स्थल को भविष्य के विरोधाभास से बचाता है और नए प्रमाण का ईमानदार मूल्यांकन संभव बनाता है।
सत्यापित स्थान, बीसवीं और इक्कीसवीं सदी का पुनर्निर्माण तथा निरंतर सार्वजनिक गतिविधि रौज़े को निश्चित दफ़न निर्णय से स्वतंत्र वास्तविक विरासत मूल्य देते हैं। इसका सही सार्वजनिक रूप ऐतिहासिक समीक्षा के अंतर्गत संबद्ध अलवी मक़ाम है; न गढ़ी हुई निश्चितता और न ऐसा स्थल जिसे केवल वंश समस्या अनसुलझी होने के कारण मिटा दिया जाए।
📝 9 paragraphs · ~23 words · 👨👦 1 father side · 👩👧 1 mother side · 🗺 3 यात्रा के चरण · 📚 5 पुस्तकें
संदर्भ
प्राथमिक स्रोत — الإفادة في تاريخ أئمة السادة उच्च
Notes: Page/Volume: ص 26 من النسخة الرقمية: يحيى وعون من أولاد علي، أمهما أسماء بنت عميس، ودرجا صغيرين | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
प्राथमिक स्रोत — نسب قريش उच्च
Notes: Page/Volume: ص 76 من النسخة الرقمية: عبد الله ومحمد وعون أبناء جعفر من أسماء بنت عميس | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
प्राथमिक स्रोत — لباب الأنساب والألقاب والأعقاب उच्च
Notes: Page/Volume: ترجمة يحيى بن علي وأولاد جعفر؛ الترقيم يختلف باختلاف الطبعة: يذكر يحيى لعلي، وعونا لجعفر | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
प्राथमिक स्रोत — إتعاظ الحنفا بأخبار الأئمة الفاطميين الخلفا उच्च
Notes: Page/Volume: ج 1، قسم نسب أولاد علي في النسخة الرقمية: يحيى وعون أمهما أسماء بنت عميس؛ الترقيم المطبوع يختلف | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
द्वितीयक स्रोत — مقاتل الطالبيين मध्यम
Notes: Page/Volume: ص 118 من النسخة الرقمية: عون بن عبد الله بن جعفر وتمييز عون الأصغر من غيره | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
द्वितीयक स्रोत — تذكرة الأولياء في تراجم الأئمة والمتصوفة والزهاد وما جاورها من البلدان मध्यम
Notes: Page/Volume: ترجمة عون بن علي، نقلها مركز تراث الحلة: المقام المشهور في قرية الباشية | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
द्वितीयक स्रोत — الرحلة العراقية: كشط الصدأ وغسل الران मध्यम
Notes: Page/Volume: ص 98–99: المرور بدوحة العون في رحلة سنة 1139هـ، بحسب النص المنقول في مركز تراث الحلة | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
द्वितीयक स्रोत — غاية المرام في تاريخ محاسن بغداد دار السلام मध्यम
Notes: Page/Volume: موضع مراقد بغداد وما جاورها: مرقد عون في قرية الباشية؛ الترقيم يختلف باختلاف الطبعة | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
द्वितीयक स्रोत — جامع الأنوار في مناقب الأخيار मध्यम
Notes: Page/Volume: ص 581 بحسب نقل مركز تراث الحلة: مدفن منسوب إلى عون بن علي في قرية الباشية | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
वेब स्रोत — usul.ai मध्यम
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
वेब स्रोत — shamela.ws मध्यम
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
वेब स्रोत — usul.ai मध्यम
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
वेब स्रोत — usul.ai मध्यम
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
वेब स्रोत — shamela.ws मध्यम
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
वेब स्रोत — www.mk.iq मध्यम
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
वेब स्रोत — magazine.imn.iq मध्यम
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
वेब स्रोत — alkafeel.net मध्यम
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
वेब स्रोत — alkafeel.net मध्यम
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
चित्र दीर्घा
📤 इस स्थान की तस्वीर भेजें
निकटवर्ती दरगाहें
⏳ निकटवर्ती दरगाहें लोड हो रही हैं…