مزارِ منسوب حضرت عون بن علی علیہ السلام
اردو العربية English فارسی हिन्दी
مقام عون بن علی؛ مزار عون الاصغر؛ دوحۃ العون
ان نشانات کا مطلب
نشانات موجودہ حوالہ جات، نسبت کے نوٹس اور GPS metadata کی بنیاد پر احتیاط سے دکھائے جاتے ہیں۔ یہ حتمی تاریخی فتویٰ نہیں ہیں۔
⚙️ پرنٹ، اشتراک اور دوسرے اختیارات
تعارف
بابل کے ضلع الہاشمیہ کی ناحیہ مدحتیہ کے گاؤں الباشیہ میں واقع یہ مزار ایک قدیم مقامی مقام ہے جو عون بن علی سے منسوب ہے۔ اس کے تصدیق شدہ جغرافیائی نقاط اور مسلسل زیارت مادی مقام کی شناخت ثابت کرتے ہیں، مگر یہ چیزیں خود بخود مدفون شخصیت کی قطعی شناخت ثابت نہیں کرتیں۔ اسی لیے اس ریکارڈ کو یقینی بنیادی مدفن کے بجائے ثانوی منسوب مقام قرار دیا گیا ہے۔
قدیم زیدی نسبی کتاب الافادۃ فی تاریخ ائمۃ السادۃ کے دستیاب برقی نسخے کے صفحہ ۲۶ میں یحییٰ اور عون کو امام علی بن ابی طالب علیہ السلام کے بیٹوں میں شمار کیا گیا ہے، ان کی والدہ اسماء بنت عمیس لکھی گئی ہیں اور دونوں کے کم عمری میں وفات پانے کا ذکر ہے۔ مقریزی کی بعد کی نسبی تلخیص اتعاظ الحنفا میں بھی یحییٰ اور عون کو اسماء بنت عمیس سے حضرت علی علیہ السلام کے بیٹے بتایا گیا ہے۔ یہ ماخذ عون نامی فرزند کی ایک نسبی روایت ثابت کرتے ہیں، مگر اسے الباشیہ سے نہیں جوڑتے اور نہ بالغ فوجی زندگی بیان کرتے ہیں۔
دوسرے قدیم نسبی ماخذ مختلف ترتیب محفوظ کرتے ہیں۔ نسب قریش، صفحہ ۷۶ میں عبداللہ، محمد اور عون کو جعفر بن ابی طالب کے بیٹے اور اسماء بنت عمیس کی اولاد بتایا گیا ہے۔ علی بن زید بیہقی کی لباب الانساب بھی اسماء سے حضرت علی علیہ السلام کے بیٹے کے طور پر صرف یحییٰ کا نام لیتی ہے، جبکہ عبداللہ، محمد اور عون کو جعفر کی اولاد قرار دیتی ہے۔ یہی اختلاف واضح کرتا ہے کہ عون بن علی کی شناخت میں احتیاط ضروری ہے اور مقامی لقب عون الاصغر کو یکساں طور پر ثابت قدیم نام نہیں سمجھا جاسکتا۔
اس مقام کو عبداللہ بن جعفر کے خاندان کے عون نامی افراد سے بھی الگ رکھنا ضروری ہے۔ مقاتل الطالبیین کے برقی نسخے کے صفحہ ۱۱۸ میں عون بن عبداللہ بن جعفر کا ذکر ہے اور عون الاصغر کو کربلا سے وابستہ دوسرے عون سے الگ کیا گیا ہے۔ بعد کی نسبی کتابیں بھی مختلف طالبی شاخوں میں عون نام کے کئی افراد محفوظ کرتی ہیں۔ اس لیے صرف نام کی یکسانی کی وجہ سے الباشیہ کے مزار کو معروف کربلائی شخصیات کے ساتھ نہیں ملایا جاسکتا۔
مادی مزار کی تحریری تاریخ ابتدائی جدید اور عثمانی دور کے ماخذ میں زیادہ واضح ہوتی ہے۔ مرکز تراث الحلہ نے مرتضیٰ آل نظمی زادہ بغدادی کا بیان نقل کیا ہے، جس میں الباشیہ میں عون بن علی سے منسوب مشہور زیارت گاہ کا ذکر ہے۔ اسی مرکز نے مصطفیٰ صدیقی خلوتی کے ۱۱۳۹ ہجری کے عراقی سفر میں دوحۃ العون سے گزرنے کا بیان، اور یاسین عمری و صفی الدین بندنیجی کے وہ حوالے بھی نقل کیے ہیں جن میں الباشیہ کے معروف مقام کی شناخت کی گئی۔ یہ شہادتیں ثابت کرتی ہیں کہ مقام کی نسبت اور زیارت کئی صدیوں پہلے مشہور ہوچکی تھی۔
یہ بعد کے تاریخی بیانات مدفون شخص کی حیاتی شناخت سے زیادہ مضبوطی کے ساتھ مزار کی قدامت اور مقامی روایت کا تسلسل ثابت کرتے ہیں۔ ان میں عموماً وہی نام دہرایا گیا ہے جس سے مقام زائرین کے درمیان مشہور تھا؛ پہلی اسلامی صدی سے قبر تک مسلسل سند فراہم نہیں کی گئی۔ اسی وجہ سے مضمون قدیم نام، زیارتی یاد اور عمارت کی تاریخ محفوظ کرتا ہے، مگر دقیق نسب اور تدفینی شناخت کو زیر تحقیق رکھتا ہے۔
شبکہ عراقیہ کی ایک حالیہ میدانی رپورٹ موجودہ متولیانہ روایت نقل کرتی ہے کہ عون کی پیدائش ۱۶ ہجری میں ہوئی، انہوں نے نہروان میں جنگ کی، ۳۸ ہجری میں زخموں سے وفات پائی اور اسی مقام پر دفن ہوئے، جبکہ نو صفر کو یاد منائی جاتی ہے۔ یہ مقام کی موجودہ زبانی اور ادارہ جاتی روایت کے لیے اہم شہادت ہے۔ تاہم اس تحقیق میں استعمال ہونے والے قدیم نسبی ماخذ یا تو عون کے کم عمری میں وفات پانے کا ذکر کرتے ہیں یا اس بات میں مختلف ہیں کہ وہ حضرت علی کے بیٹے تھے یا جعفر کے، اور وہ نہروان کی یہ سوانح نہیں دیتے۔ اس لیے پیدائش، شہادت اور تدفین کی یہ تفصیل جدید مقامی روایت کے طور پر محفوظ ہے، ثابت قدیم تاریخ کے طور پر نہیں۔
مزار کے مادی احاطے کی اپنی مستقل ورثہ جاتی تاریخ ہے۔ مرکز تراث الحلہ کے مطابق پرانی عمارت کو مقامی باشندوں نے ۱۹۵۷ عیسوی میں تعمیر کیا، صحن ۱۹۶۰ میں بنایا گیا اور جولائی ۲۰۱۴ میں بڑی تعمیر نو کے لیے عمارت منہدم کی گئی۔ ۲۰۲۶ کی میدانی رپورٹ ۱۹۳۸ کے تسویۂ اراضی فیصلے کا ذکر کرتی ہے، ۲۰۱۱ میں مزار کے امانتِ عامہ للمزارات الشیعیہ سے انتظامی الحاق کو بیان کرتی ہے اور جدید تعمیر کے دوران ایک قدیم گنبد کو محفوظ رکھنے کی اطلاع دیتی ہے۔ یہ تفصیلات ادارے اور معماری کے تسلسل کو ثابت کرتی ہیں، پہلی صدی کے مدفن کا مسئلہ حل نہیں کرتیں۔
اس لیے اس ریکارڈ کی تاریخی قدر تین الگ سطحوں میں ہے: عون نامی شخصیت کی مختلف فیہ نسبی یاد، الباشیہ میں ابتدائی جدید و عثمانی دور سے ثابت زیارتی روایت، اور تصدیق شدہ جغرافیہ و مقامی سرگرمی رکھنے والا زندہ جدید مزار۔ ان سطحوں کو الگ رکھنے سے عقیدت اور تاریخی دیانت دونوں محفوظ رہتی ہیں۔ مقام کو عون بن علی سے منسوب مزار کے طور پر احترام سے محفوظ اور زیارت کیا جاسکتا ہے، جبکہ قطعی مدفن کا درجہ پانے کے لیے ایسی قدیم تحریر، وقف نامہ، آثارِ قدیمہ یا مسلسل دستاویزی شہادت درکار ہوگی جو قبر کی شناخت براہِ راست ثابت کرے۔
👨👦 والد کی طرف
👩👧 والدہ کی طرف
🗺 سفر کا نقشہ
📚 کتب
تاریخی / دینی اہمیت
اس مزار کی پہلی تاریخی اہمیت ایک مقامی علوی نسبت کے باقی رہنے میں ہے، جس کا تحریری ریکارڈ ابتدائی جدید اور عثمانی دور کے مصنفین تک پہنچتا ہے۔ مدفون شخصیت کی قطعی شناخت نہ ہونے کے باوجود نام، زیارت اور عمارت کا تسلسل بابل کی مذہبی تاریخ کا مستقل حصہ ہے۔
دوسری اہمیت نسبی تحقیق میں ہے۔ ایک طرف الافادۃ اور مقریزی، اور دوسری طرف نسب قریش و لباب الانساب کا اختلاف دکھاتا ہے کہ اسماء بنت عمیس کے مشترک تعلق کی وجہ سے حضرت علی اور جعفر کی اولاد کے نام کس طرح خلط ہوسکتے تھے۔ اس طرح یہ مزار ڈیٹابیس میں شخصی شناخت الگ کرنے کی عملی مثال فراہم کرتا ہے۔
جدید نہروان والی روایت زندہ اجتماعی یاد کے طور پر اہم ہے، مگر اسے واضح نسبت کے ساتھ رکھنا ضروری ہے۔ پیدائش، جنگ اور شہادت کی تاریخوں کو پہلی صدی کی ثابت تاریخ کے بجائے موجودہ متولیانہ روایت قرار دینے سے مقام آئندہ تضاد سے محفوظ رہتا ہے اور نئی شہادت کا دیانت داری سے جائزہ لیا جاسکتا ہے۔
تصدیق شدہ مقام، بیسویں و اکیسویں صدی کی تعمیرات اور مسلسل عوامی سرگرمی مزار کو قطعی مدفن کے فیصلے سے الگ حقیقی ورثہ جاتی قدر دیتی ہیں۔ اس کا درست عوامی کردار زیر تحقیق منسوب علوی مقام ہے؛ نہ مصنوعی یقین، اور نہ ایسا مقام جسے صرف نسبی مسئلہ حل نہ ہونے کی وجہ سے مٹا دیا جائے۔
📝 9 paragraphs · ~0 words · 👨👦 1 father side · 👩👧 1 mother side · 🗺 1 سفر کے مراحل · 📚 1 کتب
حوالہ جات
بنیادی ماخذ — الإفادة في تاريخ أئمة السادة زیادہ
Notes: Page/Volume: ص 26 من النسخة الرقمية: يحيى وعون من أولاد علي، أمهما أسماء بنت عميس، ودرجا صغيرين | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
بنیادی ماخذ — نسب قريش زیادہ
Notes: Page/Volume: ص 76 من النسخة الرقمية: عبد الله ومحمد وعون أبناء جعفر من أسماء بنت عميس | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
بنیادی ماخذ — لباب الأنساب والألقاب والأعقاب زیادہ
Notes: Page/Volume: ترجمة يحيى بن علي وأولاد جعفر؛ الترقيم يختلف باختلاف الطبعة: يذكر يحيى لعلي، وعونا لجعفر | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
بنیادی ماخذ — إتعاظ الحنفا بأخبار الأئمة الفاطميين الخلفا زیادہ
Notes: Page/Volume: ج 1، قسم نسب أولاد علي في النسخة الرقمية: يحيى وعون أمهما أسماء بنت عميس؛ الترقيم المطبوع يختلف | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
ثانوی ماخذ — مقاتل الطالبيين درمیانہ
Notes: Page/Volume: ص 118 من النسخة الرقمية: عون بن عبد الله بن جعفر وتمييز عون الأصغر من غيره | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
ثانوی ماخذ — تذكرة الأولياء في تراجم الأئمة والمتصوفة والزهاد وما جاورها من البلدان درمیانہ
Notes: Page/Volume: ترجمة عون بن علي، نقلها مركز تراث الحلة: المقام المشهور في قرية الباشية | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
ثانوی ماخذ — الرحلة العراقية: كشط الصدأ وغسل الران درمیانہ
Notes: Page/Volume: ص 98–99: المرور بدوحة العون في رحلة سنة 1139هـ، بحسب النص المنقول في مركز تراث الحلة | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
ثانوی ماخذ — غاية المرام في تاريخ محاسن بغداد دار السلام درمیانہ
Notes: Page/Volume: موضع مراقد بغداد وما جاورها: مرقد عون في قرية الباشية؛ الترقيم يختلف باختلاف الطبعة | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
ثانوی ماخذ — جامع الأنوار في مناقب الأخيار درمیانہ
Notes: Page/Volume: ص 581 بحسب نقل مركز تراث الحلة: مدفن منسوب إلى عون بن علي في قرية الباشية | Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
ویب ماخذ — usul.ai درمیانہ
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
ویب ماخذ — shamela.ws درمیانہ
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
ویب ماخذ — usul.ai درمیانہ
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
ویب ماخذ — usul.ai درمیانہ
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
ویب ماخذ — shamela.ws درمیانہ
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
ویب ماخذ — www.mk.iq درمیانہ
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
ویب ماخذ — magazine.imn.iq درمیانہ
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
ویب ماخذ — alkafeel.net درمیانہ
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
ویب ماخذ — alkafeel.net درمیانہ
Notes: Article role: SECONDARY ATTRIBUTED PLACE / LONG-STANDING LOCAL BURIAL TRADITION. The physical location, GPS and current shrine activity are verified independently from the identity of the buried person. Al-Ifada fi Tarikh A'immat al-Sada, p. 26, lists Yahya and Awn as sons of Ali by Asma bint Umays and says both died young. Al-Maqrizi preserves a similar later list. In contrast, Nasab Quraysh, p. 76, and Lubab al-Ansab identify Asma's Awn as a son of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and name only Yahya as her child by Ali. The exact genealogical identity is therefore Level B. Maqatil al-Talibiyyin, p. 118, distinguishes men named Awn in the family of Abd Allah ibn Jafar and the Karbala narratives. The Hillah Heritage Centre documents a centuries-old Al-Bashiya attribution through Al Nazmizade, Mustafa al-Siddiqi's 1139 AH journey, Yasin al-Umari and Safi al-Din al-Bandniji; these support the shrine tradition, not a first-century burial chain. The 2026 Iraqi Media Network field report records the present custodial narrative of birth in 16 AH, martyrdom after Nahrawan in 38 AH, burial at the site and commemoration on 9 Safar. Because this is not corroborated by the early genealogical sources and conflicts with the report that Awn died young, it is retained only as modern local tradition. Building history, cadastral notice and administration are retained as site heritage. No fake person code, body-transfer story, spouse, child or definitive grave claim was added.
تصاویر
📤 اس مقام کی تصویر جمع کریں
قریبی مزارات
⏳ قریبی مزارات لوڈ ہو رہے ہیں…