A strong classical report from Ibn Umar describes a Bedouin meeting the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ during a journey and asking for a witness to his message. The Prophet called a tree from the side of the valley; it came to him, testified three times that he was truthful, and returned to its place. Ibn Kathir calls the chain good, al-Haythami says its transmitters are transmitters of the Sahih, and Ibn Hibban includes it in his Sahih. A separate Rukana story also describes a tree coming and returning on command, but that exact route is mursal.
The Bedouin did not immediately accept. Instead, he asked a direct question: who would bear witness to what the Prophet was saying? The Prophet ﷺ pointed to a tree growing at the side of the valley and said that it would be the witness.
Then came the extraordinary sign. The Prophet called the tree. The report says that it came forward, cutting a track through the ground, until it stood before him. In the wording preserved by Ibn Hibban, al-Darimi and other hadith sources, the tree actually comes from its place to stand before the Prophet.
The Prophet ﷺ then asked the tree to bear witness. He did so three times, and the report says that on each occasion the tree testified that the Prophet was truthful in what he had said. After completing its testimony, the tree was commanded to return, and it went back to the place where it had been growing.
The reaction of the Bedouin gives the scene a beautiful ending. He returned toward his people saying, in meaning, that if they followed him he would bring them to the Prophet; if they refused, he himself would come back and remain with him. The sign had moved the conversation from a request for proof to a willingness to carry the message home.
This Ibn Umar report has substantial classical support. Ibn Kathir reproduces it and calls its chain good. Al-Haythami says its transmitters are transmitters of the Sahih, al-Suyuti records a sahih grading, and Ibn Hibban placed it in his Sahih. Al-Darimi and al-Bayhaqi also preserve the same event with close wording.
There is also a famous separate story involving Rukana in Mecca: after their wrestling encounter, the Prophet reportedly called a visible tree, it came and stood before him, and then returned on command. Ibn Kathir explicitly notes that Ibn Ishaq transmitted that exact Rukana sequence mursal. The two reports should therefore not be blended.
The most secure centerpiece is the Ibn Umar account: a traveler asking for a witness, a tree coming at the Prophet’s call, threefold testimony to his truthfulness, return to its place, and a man leaving ready to take the message back to his people.
Conclusion
Authenticity: the broader prophetic miracle of a tree coming at the Prophet’s command and bearing witness is strongly supported in the separate Ibn Umar report. The most reliable story is the one in which the tree comes from the valley side, testifies three times, returns to its place, and leaves the Bedouin ready to take the message back to his people.
Sources
V3_TASK_4_LINKAGE_AND_METADATA_CONFIRMATION: linked to CLM-01 and independently verified Ibn Kathir, al-Bidaya wa'l-Nihaya, vol. 4 pp. 255-256. The Rukana sequence explicitly gives the Prophet calling a visible tree, the tree coming until it stood before him, and returning to its place on command. Ibn Kathir explicitly states that Ibn Ishaq transmitted this exact story mursal with this wording.
V3_TASK_4_LINKAGE_AND_GRADING_CONFIRMATION: linked to CLM-05 and independently verified Ibn Kathir's Ibn Umar tree-testimony route in the chapter on tree obedience. The report gives the Bedouin's request for a witness, the tree coming from the side of the valley, threefold testimony, and return to its place. Ibn Kathir explicitly calls this chain isnad jayyid and notes that it was not narrated by Ahmad.
V3_TASK_4_LINKAGE_AND_METADATA_CONFIRMATION: linked to CLM-04 and independently verified Sahih Ibn Hibban 6505, vol. 14 p. 434. It explicitly gives the Ibn Umar journey setting, a Bedouin asking for a witness, the tree coming from the valley side, testifying three times that the Prophet was as he said, and returning to its place.
V3_TASK_4_SAME_TRADITION_CONFIRMATION: linked as additional same-Ibn-Ishaq-tradition support for CLM-01. Ibn Hisham vol. 1 p. 391 preserves the Rukana story with the tree coming to the Prophet and returning on command. This is not treated as an independent isnad.
V3_TASK_4_LINKAGE_REPAIR: direct Ibn Kathir vol. 4 pp. 255-256 row added for CLM-02. The Rukana story explicitly says the Prophet commanded the tree to return to its place and it returned.
V3_TASK_4_LINKAGE_REPAIR: direct Ibn Kathir vol. 4 pp. 255-256 row added for CLM-03. Ibn Kathir explicitly calls this exact Ibn Ishaq Rukana sequence mursal and separately notes stronger tree-coming reports on other occasions. The broader strength is not transferred into the exact Rukana chain.
V3_TASK_4_COLLECTION_STATUS_LINK: Sahih Ibn Hibban 6505 linked directly to CLM-05 as the collection-status half of the grading claim. Ibn Hibban includes the Ibn Umar tree-testimony report in his Sahih; Ibn Kathir's own isnad-jayyid judgment remains separately linked through SRC-02.