مرقد المختار الثقفي

التعريف

المراجع

مصدر أولي — تاريخ الرسل والملوك مرتفع

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

مصدر أولي — أنساب الأشراف مرتفع

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

مصدر أولي — صحيح مسلم مرتفع

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

مصدر أولي — جامع الترمذي مرتفع

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

مصدر ثانوي — البداية والنهاية متوسط

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

مصدر ثانوي — مقاتل الطالبيين متوسط

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

مصدر ثانوي — أعيان الشيعة متوسط

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

مصدر إلكتروني — masjed-alkufa.com متوسط

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

مصدر إلكتروني — www.iranicaonline.org متوسط

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

المزارات القريبة

الشخصيات والمواقع المرتبطة