अल-मुख़्तार अल-सक़फ़ी का मज़ार

परिचय

संदर्भ

प्राथमिक स्रोत — تاريخ الرسل والملوك उच्च

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

प्राथमिक स्रोत — أنساب الأشراف उच्च

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

प्राथमिक स्रोत — صحيح مسلم उच्च

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

प्राथमिक स्रोत — جامع الترمذي उच्च

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

द्वितीयक स्रोत — البداية والنهاية मध्यम

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

द्वितीयक स्रोत — مقاتل الطالبيين मध्यम

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

द्वितीयक स्रोत — أعيان الشيعة मध्यम

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

वेब स्रोत — masjed-alkufa.com मध्यम

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

वेब स्रोत — www.iranicaonline.org मध्यम

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

निकटवर्ती दरगाहें

संबंधित व्यक्ति और स्थान