آرامگاه مختار ثقفی

معرفی

منابع

منبع اولیه — تاريخ الرسل والملوك زیاد

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

منبع اولیه — أنساب الأشراف زیاد

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

منبع اولیه — صحيح مسلم زیاد

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

منبع اولیه — جامع الترمذي زیاد

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

منبع ثانویه — البداية والنهاية متوسط

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

منبع ثانویه — مقاتل الطالبيين متوسط

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

منبع ثانویه — أعيان الشيعة متوسط

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

منبع اینترنتی — masjed-alkufa.com متوسط

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

منبع اینترنتی — www.iranicaonline.org متوسط

Notes: Page/Volume: أحداث سنتي ٦٦ و٦٧ هـ؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أخبار المختار وحركة الكوفة؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: حديث الكذاب والمبير من ثقيف؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: أبواب الفتن، خبر الكذاب والمبير؛ الرقم يختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: الأخبار المتصلة بآل أبي طالب وحركة المختار؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Page/Volume: ترجمة المختار الثقفي؛ الصفحات تختلف باختلاف الطبعات | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person. | Al-Tabari and Ansab al-Ashraf support the Second Fitna, Mukhtar's seizure of Kufa, retaliation movement, and conflict with Musab ibn al-Zubayr. Sahih Muslim preserves the Thaqif liar/bloodshedder report without naming Mukhtar in the quoted opening; the application of the liar to Mukhtar is a later scholarly identification also transmitted in al-Tirmidhi. Tafsir Ibn Kathir preserves the report accusing Mukhtar of a revelation claim, which is presented as an accusation and interpretation rather than an uncontested prophethood claim. Encyclopaedia Iranica supports Kufa's social setting, mawali participation, siege, death in 67 AH/687 CE, and execution of supporters. The Great Mosque of Kufa page supports the present tomb identity and later rediscovery/rebuilding tradition, not an uncritical verdict on the person.

زیارتگاه‌های نزدیک

شخصیت‌ها و مکان‌های مرتبط